<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Algorithms and Computation</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2476-2776</Issn>
				<Volume>53</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>$alpha$-Gap Greedy Spanner</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>41</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>60</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">81307</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Hosein</FirstName>
					<LastName>Salami</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Computer Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mostafa</FirstName>
					<LastName>Nouri Baygi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Computer Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>14</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>In this paper, we have introduced a new geometric spanner called $alpha$-Gap greedy spanner, which is a parametric approximation of the well-known Gap-greedy spanner. We will show theoretically and experimentally that this spanner is similar to the Gap-greedy spanner in terms of qualitative features such as weight and maximum degree of vertices. %Wehave shown that this spanner can be computed in $O(n^2 log n)$ time with$O(n)$ space, and $O(n log n)$ expected time on the set of points placedrandomly in a unit square.&lt;br /&gt;Two algorithms have been proposed with running time $O(n^2 log n)$ for constructing the $alpha$-Gap greedy spanner. Space complexity of the first algorithm is $O(n^2)$, but it is reduced to $O(n)$ in the second one. &lt;br /&gt;%The proposed algorithms have a parameter, called $alpha$, by which the similarity of the $alpha$-Gap greedy spanner to the Gap-greedy spanner, in terms of quality features mentioned above, can be determined. &lt;br /&gt;Also, we have shown on the points placed randomly in a unit square, the $alpha$-Gap greedy spanner can be constructed in the expected $O(n log n)$ time.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">computational geometry</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">geometric spanners</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">gap greedy spanner</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">construction algorithms</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">algorithm complexity</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jac.ut.ac.ir/article_81307_669c0a0df2c0484e4332a6e5ff9041b6.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
